Skip to main content
Guides

Migrating From SharePoint to Papyrus — A 90-Day Plan

A pragmatic, week-by-week migration plan from Microsoft SharePoint to Papyrus, with the rough edges flagged.

Migrating From SharePoint to Papyrus — A 90-Day Plan

SharePoint migrations are rarely just file moves. They're behaviour migrations — the way teams work needs to shift. This is a 90-day plan that respects that.

The pre-conditions

Before you start, confirm:

  • You have an executive sponsor (a CIO or COO who'll pick the bills and the political fights)
  • You have a Records Officer or equivalent for the content side
  • You have a SharePoint admin who can help with exports
  • Papyrus is provisioned, billing is set up, your domain is configured

If any of these are missing, fix them first. The migration will fail without them.

Days 1-7 — Discovery

What's actually in your SharePoint?

  • Total document count (per site collection)
  • Total storage volume
  • Document type distribution
  • Permission complexity (how many unique groups, how deep the inheritance)
  • Active vs dormant content (last-touch date histogram)
  • Custom columns and metadata
  • Workflows in flight (SharePoint Designer or Power Automate)
  • Integrations (the SharePoint sites that other systems pull from)

This is unglamorous archaeology. Three days minimum.

Days 8-14 — Decide what doesn't come

Migrations fail when they try to bring everything. Decide what doesn't come:

  • Dormant content (last touched >24 months ago): typically 60-70% of volume. Move to cold archive, not to Papyrus
  • Personal sites (My Sites): don't migrate; users export their own keepers
  • Duplicate content: SharePoint duplicates 40-50% of content; let Papyrus's deduplication catch the rest
  • Test sites and abandoned project sites: archive, don't migrate

After this exercise, you'll typically migrate 20-30% of your SharePoint volume to Papyrus. That's a feature, not a bug.

Days 15-21 — Map structure

For the content that is coming, decide the target structure in Papyrus:

  • Departments (Papyrus's top-level scoping)
  • Folder hierarchy (Papyrus prefers flat; resist deep folder trees)
  • Classifications (your AI-categorisation taxonomy)
  • Tags (where SharePoint columns become Papyrus tags)
  • Permissions (translated from SharePoint's group model)

Don't recreate SharePoint's structure in Papyrus. That's a missed opportunity.

Days 22-35 — Run the export

SharePoint exports run via the Migration API or third-party tools (ShareGate, Metalogix). Plan:

  • Throttling: Microsoft throttles exports; budget 2-3× your naive estimate
  • Format: export to a portable format (PDF for finalised content, original Office formats for editable)
  • Metadata: capture every SharePoint column you've decided to keep

Export to staging storage; do not point exports directly at Papyrus.

Days 36-50 — Ingest in waves

Ingest one department at a time. For each:

  1. Upload a sample (50-100 documents)
  2. Verify classification and extraction accuracy
  3. Adjust the classification configuration if needed
  4. Bulk ingest the rest
  5. Spot-check the result

A typical wave takes 1-2 days per 10K documents. The bottleneck is usually QA, not throughput.

Days 51-65 — Permissions and access

Translate SharePoint's permission model to Papyrus's:

  • SharePoint groups → Papyrus roles + departments
  • Site-level permissions → folder-level permissions
  • Document-level overrides → preserved as Papyrus document permissions

This is the most labour-intensive phase. Plan for 2 weeks.

Don't over-restrict

SharePoint permissions tend to accumulate over years. When in doubt, open up rather than lock down — users complaining they can't access something is recoverable; users finding something they shouldn't is not.

## Days 66-75 — Workflow translation

SharePoint workflows (Designer, Power Automate) translate to Papyrus workflow templates. For each in-flight workflow:

  • Identify the trigger (document upload, status change, scheduled)
  • Identify the actions (approval, notification, route)
  • Reproduce in the Papyrus workflow designer
  • Test with a sample document

Some Power Automate workflows that span multiple systems are best left in Power Automate, calling Papyrus's REST API where they need document operations.

Days 76-85 — Behaviour migration

Now talk to humans. The technical migration is done; behaviour change starts here.

  • Lunch-and-learn sessions per department
  • “How I find things” walkthrough (SharePoint folder browsing → Papyrus search)
  • “How I share things” walkthrough (SharePoint share dialog → Papyrus share link)
  • “How I get approvals” walkthrough (Power Automate notification → Papyrus workflow task)
  • Champions in each department who answer questions for the first month

Days 86-90 — Cutover

Sequenced cutover:

  • Day 86: New uploads to Papyrus only (SharePoint becomes read-only for new content)
  • Day 88: Active workflows in SharePoint completed; new workflows in Papyrus only
  • Day 90: SharePoint cold-archived; primary access via Papyrus

After 90 days

Don't decommission SharePoint immediately. Keep it as a cold archive for 12 months. After 12 months without access, decommission.

What goes wrong

The classic SharePoint-to-Papyrus migration failure modes:

  1. Tried to migrate everything: 18-month project that loses sponsor support
  2. Recreated SharePoint structure: defeats the purpose of moving
  3. Skipped behaviour change: users keep working in SharePoint via web access
  4. No champion network: questions accumulate, frustration builds, adoption stalls

The fix to all four is in the planning, not the execution.

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.